Browse through the various sectors and categories available for this year's awards. You can now also nominate and add your preferred candidates directly to the official list.
The GRC & FinCrime Prevention Awards comprises of six categories of awards with various subcategories.
Entries will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. AML/CTF Programme Strength and Regulatory Compliance (25%)
2. Financial Crime Risk Management and Controls (20%)
3. Technology and Innovation (15%)
4. Organisational Culture and Training (15%)
5. Collaboration and Public-Private Partnerships (15%)
6. Measurable Outcomes and Impact (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
This award is open to all internal compliance teams working outside of the financial services sector in Nigeria. Entries must demonstrate evidence from the last 12 months, up to the awards entry deadline.
The judging panel will evaluate the medical facility's financial crime prevention strategy based on the following factors:
Policy Comprehensiveness and Effectiveness:
Leadership Commitment and Governance:
Staff Training and Awareness:
Technology and Data Analytics:
Adaptability and Regulatory Compliance:
Certifications and Recognition:
Entries will be evaluated based on the following six key criteria:
1. Financial Crime Risk Management Framework (25%)
2. Regulatory Compliance and Oversight (20%)
3. Claims and Policyholder Fraud Prevention (15%)
4. AML/KYC and Customer Due Diligence (15%)
5. Technology and Innovation (15%)
6. Culture, Training, and Sector Contribution (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Submissions will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Leadership Oversight (25%)
2. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Maturity (20%)
3. Regulatory Compliance and Control Effectiveness (20%)
4. Integration of GRC Technology and Innovation (15%)
5. Culture, Conduct and Staff Engagement (10%)
6. Impact and Stakeholder Confidence (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Submissions will be assessed based on the following six core criteria:
1. Innovation and Technological Advancement (25%)
2. Effectiveness and Client Impact (20%)
3. Regulatory Alignment and Compliance Support (15%)
4. User Experience and Integration (15%)
5. Contribution to Broader Financial Crime Ecosystem (15%)
6. Ethical Standards and Data Governance (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Structure and Ethical Oversight (25%)
2. Risk Management Maturity (20%)
3. Regulatory Compliance and Readiness (20%)
4. GRC Technology and Automation (15%)
5. Culture, Conduct and Internal Alignment (10%)
6. Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Submissions will be evaluated based on the following six key criteria:
1. Financial Crime Risk Framework and Governance (25%)
2. Compliance with Regulatory Standards (20%)
3. Third-Party and Investor Due Diligence (15%)
4. Technology and Innovation (15%)
5. Culture, Training and Awareness (15%)
6. Impact, Effectiveness, and Collaboration (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Leadership Oversight (25%)
2. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Risk Integration (20%)
3. Regulatory Compliance and Controls (20%)
4. Culture of Compliance and Ethical Conduct (15%)
5. GRC Innovation and Integration (10%)
6. Stakeholder Trust, Transparency and Impact (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Entries will be assessed against the following six core criteria:
1. AML/CTF Compliance Framework (25%)
2. Fraud Risk Management (20%)
3. Member Due Diligence & KYC Processes (15%)
4. Innovation and Technology Use (15%)
5. Organisational Culture and Training (15%)
6. Collaboration and Sector Contribution (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six key criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Board Oversight (25%)
2. Risk Management Effectiveness (20%)
3. Compliance Maturity and Regulatory Alignment (20%)
4. Culture of Integrity and Training (15%)
5. Innovation and GRC Integration (10%)
6. Stakeholder Engagement and Member Confidence (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
The Excellence in Public Sector Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) Award honors outstanding government agencies, ministries, regulatory bodies, and other public institutions that have demonstrated exceptional leadership, transparency, and accountability in managing GRC responsibilities.
This award recognizes public sector entities that proactively uphold the highest standards of regulatory compliance, manage risks efficiently, and implement governance frameworks that drive performance, trust, and service delivery. These organizations ensure legal and ethical integrity while contributing to the public good through innovation, citizen engagement, and operational excellence.
Submissions will be evaluated against the following core criteria:
1. Governance Framework and Leadership Accountability (25%)
2. Risk Management and Operational Resilience (20%)
3. Regulatory Compliance and Ethical Integrity (20%)
4. Innovation and Technology in GRC (15%)
5. Citizen Engagement and Stakeholder Trust (10%)
6. Training, Culture, and Capacity Building (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
The Excellence in Law Enforcement & Intelligence Governance Award recognizes agencies that have demonstrated outstanding leadership, operational integrity, and innovation in upholding the rule of law and national security.
This award honors organizations that combine strategic governance, risk-informed decision-making, and a strong compliance culture. Whether combating organized crime, terrorism, cyber threats, or corruption, the recipient exemplifies ethical operations, technological advancement, and measurable societal impact. It also celebrates the critical balance between national security, human rights, and public accountability.
Submissions will be evaluated against the following core criteria:
1. Strategic Governance and Leadership Integrity (25%)
2. Operational Risk Management and Resilience (20%)
3. Compliance, Human Rights, and Legal Oversight (20%)
4. Innovation and Intelligence Technology (15%)
5. Societal Impact and Public Trust (10%)
6. Collaboration and Inter-Agency Synergy (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Award Criteria:
Submissions will be assessed against the following key criteria:
1. Governance and Regulatory Compliance (25%)
2. Risk Management and Resilience (20%)
3. Financial Crime Prevention and Controls (20%)
4. Innovation in GRC and Security (15%)
5. Culture of Integrity and Accountability (10%)
6. Sustainability, ESG and Stakeholder Trust (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Entries will be judged against the following core criteria:
1. Governance and Compliance Excellence (25%)
2. Financial Crime and Fraud Prevention (20%)
3. Risk Management Strategy (20%)
4. Innovation and Improvement (15%)
5. Culture of Integrity and Accountability (10%)
6. Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Entries will be judged based on the following criteria:
1. Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)
2. Financial Crime Prevention Strategy (20%)
3. Risk Management Impact (20%)
4. Innovation and Technology Use (15%)
5. Organisational Culture and Ethics (15%)
6. Industry Influence and Collaboration (10%)
Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):
Award Criteria:
Submissions will be assessed against the following key criteria:
1. Governance and Regulatory Compliance (25%)
2. Risk Management and Resilience (20%)
3. Financial Crime Prevention and Controls (20%)
4. Innovation in GRC and Security (15%)
5. Culture of Integrity and Accountability (10%)
6. Sustainability, ESG and Stakeholder Trust (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Nominations will be evaluated against the following key criteria:
1. Regulatory Compliance and Legal Risk Management (25%)
2. Financial Crime Prevention (20%)
3. Governance and Due Diligence (15%)
4. Innovation and Technology in Compliance (15%)
5. Ethics, Culture, and Professional Conduct (15%)
6. Industry Collaboration and Impact (10%)
Supporting Materials:
The GRC & Financial Crime Prevention Achievement Award – Transportation Sector recognises outstanding contributions by organisations, teams, or individuals within the transportation industry who have demonstrated exceptional leadership, innovation, and impact in Governance, Risk Management, Compliance (GRC), and Financial Crime Prevention.
The transportation sector—spanning rail, road, maritime, and logistics—faces growing regulatory demands, cyber and operational risks, supply chain vulnerabilities, financial crime exposure, and sustainability pressures. This award honours those who have implemented robust frameworks, controls, and strategies that have significantly strengthened compliance, improved risk oversight, prevented fraud and financial crimes, and enhanced ethical and transparent operations.
Nominees are expected to have pioneered best practices, contributed to regulatory resilience, and fostered a culture of integrity and accountability across the organisation or wider industry.
Eligibility:
Entries will be judged based on the following criteria:
1. Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)
2. Financial Crime Prevention Strategy (20%)
3. Risk Management Impact (20%)
4. Innovation and Technology Use (15%)
5. Organisational Culture and Ethics (15%)
6. Industry Influence and Collaboration (10%)
Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):
Nominations will be assessed against the following six key criteria:
1. Governance and Regulatory Compliance (25%)
2. Financial Crime and Corruption Risk Management (20%)
3. Risk Management and Operational Resilience (15%)
4. Innovation and Use of Technology (15%)
5. ESG, Ethics, and Supply Chain Governance (15%)
6. Industry Influence and Stakeholder Engagement (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Entries will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. Governance and Transparency (25%)
2. Risk Management and Compliance (20%)
3. Financial Crime and Fraud Prevention (20%)
4. Innovation and Use of Technology (15%)
5. Organisational Culture and Capacity Building (10%)
6. Public Trust and Stakeholder Engagement (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Entries / Submissions will be evaluated based on the following key criteria:
1. Demonstrated Impact (25%)
2. Innovation and Strategic Approach (20%)
3. Governance and Risk Culture (15%)
4. Cross-Functional and Regulatory Collaboration (15%)
5. Sustainability and Resilience (15%)
6. Leadership, Advocacy & Influence (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Submissions will be evaluated against the following six core criteria:
1. ESG Governance and Integration (25%)
2. Impact and Measurable Results (20%)
3. Innovation and Relevance to GRC or Financial Crime (20%)
4. Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency (15%)
5. Scalability and Sustainability (10%)
6. Ethical Culture and Social Responsibility (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Nominations will be assessed using the following key criteria:
1. Thought Leadership and Expertise (25%)
2. Influence and Reach (20%)
3. Impact on Policy or Practice (20%)
4. Advocacy and Ethical Leadership (15%)
5. Engagement and Education (10%)
6. Authenticity and Integrity (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Submissions will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1. Measurable Impact (25%)
2. Collaboration and Teamwork (20%)
3. Innovation in Practice (15%)
4. Leadership and Culture (15%)
5. Agility and Responsiveness (15%)
6. Stakeholder and Industry Engagement (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Nominations will be evaluated against the following criteria:
1. Audit Excellence and Execution (25%)
2. Financial Crime Risk Identification & Mitigation (20%)
3. Innovation in Audit Practice (15%)
4. Cross-Functional Collaboration (15%)
5. Strategic Value and Organisational Impact (15%)
6. Professionalism and Ethical Conduct (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Nominations will be assessed based on the following key criteria:
1. Cybersecurity Strategy and Risk Management (25%)
2. Data Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)
3. Threat Detection, Response and Recovery (15%)
4. Innovation and Digital Resilience (15%)
5. Culture, Awareness & Training (15%)
6. Collaboration and Stakeholder Engagement (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):
Nominations will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Innovation and Originality (25%)
2. Effectiveness and Client Impact (25%)
3. Usability and User Experience (15%)
4. Alignment with GRC & FinCrime Priorities (15%)
5. Market Influence and Adoption (10%)
6. Thought Leadership and Future-readiness (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Nominations will be assessed using the following six key criteria:
1. Training Quality and Curriculum Relevance (25%)
2. Impact and Outcomes (25%)
3. Innovation in Delivery (20%)
4. Industry Reach and Sector Engagement (15%)
5. Trainer Expertise and Thought Leadership (10%)
6. Commitment to Ethics, Inclusion & Continuous Learning (5%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Nominations will be evaluated against the following six key criteria:
1. Client Impact and Value Delivery (30%)
2. Service Innovation and Adaptability (20%)
3. Breadth and Depth of Expertise (15%)
4. Quality Assurance and Governance (15%)
5. Thought Leadership and Market Influence (10%)
6. Client Relationship and Trust (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Nominations will be evaluated based on the following six key criteria:
1. Placement Success and Client Impact (30%)
2. Market Knowledge and Specialisation (20%)
3. Candidate Quality and Experience (15%)
4. Innovation and Digital Talent Solutions (15%)
5. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Practices (10%)
6. Thought Leadership and Industry Engagement (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Nominations will be evaluated based on the following six core criteria:
1. Innovation and Originality (25%)
2. Effectiveness and Client Impact (25%)
3. Usability and User Experience (15%)
4. Alignment with GRC & FinCrime Priorities (15%)
5. Market Influence and Adoption (10%)
6. Thought Leadership and Future-readiness (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
Nominations will be assessed based on the following key criteria:
1. Leadership and Strategic Impact (25%)
2. Innovation and Excellence in GRC Practice (20%)
3. Professional Integrity and Ethical Leadership (15%)
4. Industry Influence and Thought Leadership (15%)
5. Empowerment and Mentorship (15%)
6. Organisational or Public Impact (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):
The GRC Woman of the Year Award recognizes an individual who goes above and beyond to ensure compliance is at the forefront of day-to-day business operations. This award honors exemplary leadership, a commitment to risk and compliance ethics, and the promotion of innovative solutions within an organization and the professional community across Africa and Europe.
Criteria:
1. Leadership
2. Innovation
3. Expertise
4. Impact
5. Advocacy
6. Diversity and Inclusion
7. Professionalism and Integrity
Note: Nominations are open to women working in various sectors, including corporate, government, non-profit, and academia. Self-nominations and nominations from peers, colleagues, or industry partners are welcome.
Nominations will be assessed based on the following key criteria:
1. Demonstrated Impact (25%)
2. Initiative and Innovation (20%)
3. Learning and Development (15%)
4. Leadership Potential (15%)
5. Values and Ethics (15%)
6. Industry Engagement and Visibility (10%)
Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):
The award will be conferred based on the following six core criteria:
1. Distinguished Career Contributions (30%)
2. Leadership and Legacy (25%)
3. Advocacy and Ethical Commitment (15%)
4. Global or Sectoral Influence (10%)
5. Thought Leadership and Knowledge Advancement (10%)
6. Awards, Honours & Recognition (10%)
Supporting Materials (Optional):